
As reported in the Times Higher Education, after a concerted campaign by students, colleagues at UWE, and colleagues from around the world, the decision to close the Politics department has been reversed. And while there will be some restructuring of the degrees on offer and the location of the department--it will change schools--this is extremely good news for staff and students as well as the discipline as a whole in the UK.
At the same time, this particular reversal should not be taken as an opportunity to become complacent. We should not be sanguine that this will be last department under threat. Three factors indicate further problems may be looming over the horizon.
The first is that calls for closure--and closures themselves--are likely to become more prevalent as the post-Browne fees environment begins to shrink enrollments--at all levels-- while producing clear winners and losers based on the ability to recruit ABB+ students--who do not count against government caps. My understanding is that many institutions are in the midst of a three year 'wait and see' approach to enrollments. That three years will be up in 2015.
The second is that many institutions are restructuring and re-branding to emphasise vocational and professional degrees under the assumption that their prospective students are not interested in 'academic' courses. At best, this is going to put increasing pressure on Politics departments across the UK to provide evidence of the 'employability' of their graduates--something that may have contributed to the reprieve at UWE. At worst, the argument that other degrees will recruit better could lead to the threat of further closures.
The third will be the publication of the outcomes of the REF in 2015. While we can hope that the Politics and International Studies panel will be more strategic in its scoring than last time, perceptions of departmental level under-performance are often a helpful catalyst for university managers looking to streamline their operations.
So, what then is to be done?
First, at the level of the discipline, Politics needs to raise its public profile through traditional media, social media, and outreach--particularly amongst school students. The Political Studies Association and the British International Studies Association need to be doing far more to promote the discipline and to make the case that a politically informed citizenry is a public asset.
Second, both organisations need to pre-emptively script a narrative about REF outcomes. This must be a narrative that stresses the wide range of departments where internationally recognised and world leading research is being conducted. And a central part of that narrative needs to be the recognition that excellent world leading research is undertaken outside of the Russell Group.
Third, all departments ought to be thinking about how to best mobilise if a worst-case scenario comes to fruition. UWE has provided some extremely valuable lessons on how to use social media effectively and efficiently to raise awareness and generate pressure. Again, disciplinary associations should be taking a more proactive role in providing support and sharing best practice.
Given the factors noted above, the environment is only going to get harder for the Politics in the short term. Therefore, it is important that the discipline prepares itself accordingly.
Photo credit: heretakis